The process [of regenerative ag] is expensive, since farmers who embrace it must limit or forego cash crops.”
What the actual fuck is happening is in this quote. Does Larissa just not know what a cash crop is? The article has several different examples, not only of people growing regenerative crops to sell in the marketplace (making them by definition, cash crops), but even of large-scale farmers growing essentially commodity grains and earning a premium! Expense is always relative. Imagine if this sentence said, “The process of making jumbo jets is expensive, since Boeing must limit or forego the building of Sesnas and crop dusters.” In a sentence, it underlines the essential assumption that natural state of American agriculture is growing food badly and cheaply, and that to ask farmers to do otherwise is ask them to do something that, since they don’t want to do it, must be the wrong thing to do. Regeneratively grown crops are cash crops. And no one is entitled to easy work.
A Pandemic of Apathy - by Sarah Mock - Big Team Farms
from sarahmock.substack.com
Filed under:
Same Source
Related Notes
- Erysichthon’s dominionist hubris may be how we got to this climate ...from Field Notes from Christopher Brown
- I used to be an investment banker, and I enjoy reading profiles of ...from Matt Levine
- **Ag-gag** laws are anti-[whistleblower](https://en.wikipedia.org/w...from Matt McGrath
- “The antislavery movement was, after all, an agricultural reform mo...from Alexis Madrigal
- recognize how fundamentally the political economy of plants structu...from Alexis Madrigal
- Sometimes people use "respect" to mean "treating som...from kottke.org
- The Maui surfer girls love each other’s hair. It is awesome hair, l...from Susan Orlean
- Strong commitment in design is good for dementia, where challenges ...from Sara Hendren from undefended / undefeated