There’s the implicit expectation in AI and data science that if we could just “Have All The Data” then we could build our model, no problem. The best way to understand why this isn’t always sufficient is to consider the past as a series of indifferently well designed experiments, not just an impartial collection of data. Even if you have full access to all the data “collected” by history (from deep data sets to somebody’s game logs), this data was the result of conditions influenced by human decisions that weren’t always, or rather rarely were, diverse enough to count as a good experimental setup.
blog.rinesi.com | When good AI ethics is just good AI engineering - blog.rinesi.com
Filed under:
Related Notes
- There’s something qualitative and important that happens when the e...from marcbrooker@gmail.com (Marc Brooker)
- Post-Apocalyptic [or bad] software is hard to modify because it doe...from lethain.com
- the veteran artist has been through this before. Many, many times. ...from Van Neistat
- In matrix computations, *sketching* is really a synonym for (linear...from ethanepperly.com
- it's neat how *adding* affine measures is mathematically invali...from buttondown.email
- facts incorporate time [[Think about how we structure data for ours...from InfoQ
- errors are values The Go Programming Language | Gopherfest 2015 |...from The Go Programming Language
- don't communicate by sharing memory share memory by communicat...from The Go Programming Language