I think what has happened is there was a massive overestimation of the capability of mis- and disinformation to change people’s minds — of its actual persuasive power. That doesn’t mean it’s not a problem, but we have to reframe how we look at it — as less of something that is done to us and more of a supply and demand problem. We live in a world where people can choose to seal themselves into an information environment that reinforces their preconceived notions, that reinforces the things they want to believe about themselves and about others. And in doing so, they can participate in their own radicalization. They can participate in fooling themselves, but that is not something that’s necessarily being done to them.
Should we “resist trying to make things better” when it comes to online misinformation?
from Doug Belshaw
- we are creating more data than we can manage. The primary output o...from johnnydecimal.com
- Sometimes people use "respect" to mean "treating som...from kottke.org
- I recommend that teams receiving executive feedback try to “extract...from Irrational Exuberance
- That said, much like [internal communication](https://lethain.com/i...from Irrational Exuberance
- The people whose compensation depends on your opinion have ample ti...from yosefk.com
- I recommend sharing the full document with the group, then spending...from Irrational Exuberance
- In *Staff Engineer*, I argued that writing an engineering strategie...from Irrational Exuberance
- A strategy is composed of three parts: 1. **Diagnosis:** a theory ...from Irrational Exuberance