The fundamental problem is that there’s a fundamental disagreement inside people’s heads — that people are inconsistent on what responsibility they believe information intermediaries should have for making society better. People generally believe that if something is against their side, that the platforms have a huge responsibility. And if something is on their side, [the platforms] should have no responsibility. It’s extremely rare to find people who are consistent in this.
Should we “resist trying to make things better” when it comes to online misinformation?
from Doug Belshaw
Filed under:
Same Source
Related Notes
- To exchange one orthodoxy for another is not necessarily an advance...from orwell.ru
- as the ecotheologian Thomas Berry has written, "we must say of...from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- A product is useless without a platform, or more precisely and accu...from gist.github.com
- You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence i...from Robert M. Pirsig
- Many of our beliefs were learned before we had a choice in what we ...from Rick Rubin
- When you see the world as magical, it meets you as a magical place....from Simon Sarris
- The people whose compensation depends on your opinion have ample ti...from yosefk.com
- Imperfect social media tools gave anyone the ability to publish the...from Garbage Day