No chief executive officer of a big company wants to file for bankruptcy if it is not strictly necessary.
There is a neater approach:
- You put the liabilities in a box. You create a new subsidiary, you put the product-that-kills-people business in that subsidiary, and you transfer the liabilities related to that product to the subsidiary. This is, in general, hard to do, but in fact Texas has a weird merger law that allows it: You can “merge” your company into two companies, one with the liabilities and one with the rest of the business.
- You have the box — the new subsidiary with all the product liabilities — file for bankruptcy. You get fair and consistent adjudication of the product claims, inside the box, and the rest of the company just goes along relatively normally.
This is called the “ Texas two-step .”
Money Stuff: Johnson & Johnson’s Bankruptcy Didn’t Work
from Matt Levine ✉️
Filed under:
Related Notes
- **Ag-gag** laws are anti-[whistleblower](https://en.wikipedia.org/w...from Matt McGrath
- If all the burghers of Small Town USA get together and say “we want...from Matt Levine
- It is funny to imagine an end state here in which markets are entir...from Matt Levine
- After 2008, there was a perception that the government was implicit...from Matt Levine
- from the SEC’s perspective the important thing here is that the rul...from Matt Levine
- Unlike simple machines, which cannot be copyrighted, software is au...from Why Software Patents are Bad, Period.
- People often start from the mistaken notion that patents are a righ...from Why Software Patents are Bad, Period.
- the assumption in a patent trial *isn’t* that you stole the idea. ...from Why Software Patents are Bad, Period.