I make a practice of regularly checking in about whether I have a dutiful stance towards some aspect of my research. Once I notice, I can usually summon curiosity by asking lots of questions, imagining potential implications, and so on. Michael Nielsen has some great notes on tactics for this in his Notes on creative contexts.. Often I need to improve the framing, to find one which better expresses what I’m deeply excited about. If I can’t find a problem statement which captures my curiosity, it’s best to drop the project for now.
Cultivating depth and stillness in research
from Andy Matuschak
Filed under:
Same Source
Related Notes
- What would it look like if we could ask, "how do I make this t...from John Cutler from The Beautiful Mess
- I used to be an investment banker, and I enjoy reading profiles of ...from Matt Levine
- My favorite observation from The Phoenix Project by Gene Kim, Kevin...from Will Larson
- The lesson is that, for those of us who live online, having a simpl...from ongoing by Tim Bray
- Sometimes people use "respect" to mean "treating som...from kottke.org
- **THE PRIORITIZATION MATRIX** All of the projects and activities o...from review.firstround.com
- The process and the practice: - Sources and habits - Seeds - Exper...from Rick Rubin
- Often, in making edits to a work: The ego comes in, saying: I wante...from Rick Rubin