The fact that this slight change in study design yielded opposite results suggests the results aren’t reliable. If you tweak your design parameters slightly, without a clear hypothesis-driven reason to do so, and the whole thing falls apart, that suggests your results may not be real but rather are just statistical noise.
Evolution of Florida vaccine analysis
from Katelyn Jetelina and Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD from Your Local Epidemiologist ✉️
Filed under:
Related Notes
- Remember kids, the only difference between fooling around and scien...from Hacker News
- Often, people who don’t have access to the raw data expect one narr...from Josh Beckman
- The upshot for the industry at large, is: the **LLM-as-Moat model h...from Steve Yegge
- The first image ever transmitted to Earth from another planet was r...from Instagram
- My experience is companies do not anticipate that the cost of monit...from Mathew Duggan
- Ad-hoc validation leads to a phenomenon that the [language-theoreti...from Alexis King
- the difference between validation and parsing lies almost entirely ...from Alexis King
- much of science is straightforward, logical, almost rote. It's ...from apenwarr