much of science is straightforward, logical, almost rote. It's easy to ask questions; toddlers do it. It's not too hard to hire grad student lab assistants to execute experiments. It's relatively easy for an analyst or statistician to look at a pile of observations from an experiment and draw conclusions.
There's just one really hard step, the middle step: coming up with testable hypotheses. By testable, we mean, we can design an experiment that is actually possible to execute, that will tell us if the hypothesis is true or not, hopefully leading toward answering the original question. Testable hypotheses are, I've heard, where string theory falls flat. We have lots of theories, lots of hypotheses, and billions of dollars to build supercolliders, but we are surprisingly short of things we are able to test for, in order to make the next leap forward.
apenwarr | Systems design 2: What we hope we knowJosh Beckman
- I think informatics is a much better word to use, right? Computer ...from Strange Loop Conference
- Remember kids, the only difference between fooling around and scien...from Hacker News
- there have been many experiments running rats through all kinds of ...from Gwern Branwen
- The fact that this slight change in study design yielded opposite r...from Katelyn Jetelina and Kristen Panthagani, MD, PhD from Your Local Epidemiologist
- That whole summer in Colorado was a data-gathering bust, but it tau...from Hope Jahren
- I wanted to be studying plant growth, but science for war will alwa...from Hope Jahren
- People are like plants: they grow toward the light. I chose science...from Hope Jahren
- In the lab or studio, the hardest question to answer is What shall ...from sarahendren.substack.com