Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
Overview
The rule expresses the opinion that the argued flexibility and extensibility designed into the programming language Lisp includes all functionality that is theoretically needed to write any complex computer program, and that the features required to develop and manage such complexity in other programming languages are equivalent to some subset of the methods used in Lisp.
Other programming languages, while claiming to be simpler, require programmers to reinvent in a haphazard way a significant amount of needed functionality that is present in Lisp as a standard, time-proven base.
Greenspun's tenth rule
from From Wikipedia, the free
Filed under:
Related Notes
- A bay is a noun only if water is dead. When bay is a noun, it is de...from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- Among our Potawatomi people, there are public names and true names....from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- Dependencies (coupling) is an important concern to address, but it&...from kbouck
- By replacing integration tests with unit tests, we're losing al...from Computer Things
- Words matter, and the words you say about yourself and other people...from Josh Beckman
- I propose that there is one problem chief among them, an impetus fo...from George Hosu
- When software -- or idea-ware for that matter -- fails to be access...from gist.github.com
- Any software is considered free software so long as it upholds the ...from writefreesoftware.org