When software – or idea-ware for that matter – fails to be accessible to anyone for any reason, it is the fault of the software or of the messaging of the idea. It is an Accessibility failure.
Like anything else big and important in life, Accessibility has an evil twin who, jilted by the unbalanced affection displayed by their parents in their youth, has grown into an equally powerful Arch-Nemesis (yes, there's more than one nemesis to accessibility) named Security. And boy howdy are the two ever at odds.
But I'll argue that Accessibility is actually more important than Security because dialing Accessibility to zero means you have no product at all, whereas dialing Security to zero can still get you a reasonably successful product such as the Playstation Network. Platforms solve accessibility. Platforms are accessible.
Stevey's Google Platforms Rant
- Dependencies (coupling) is an important concern to address, but it&...from kbouck
- By replacing integration tests with unit tests, we're losing al...from Computer Things
- I propose that there is one problem chief among them, an impetus fo...from George Hosu
- Any software is considered free software so long as it upholds the ...from writefreesoftware.org
- Nathan's four Laws of Software: Software is a gas Soft...from Jeff Atwood
- Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad ho...from From Wikipedia, the free
- Ad-hoc validation leads to a phenomenon that the language-theoretic...from Alexis King
- the difference between validation and parsing lies almost entirely ...from Alexis King