in the U.S., there’s a false idea that certain choices around food aren’t political and also that U.S. cuisine is big enough to hold all the foods of the world. This melds into notions around how the market and technology are inevitable and infinite, and thus can save us from any crises. It’s not gastronativism, but gastroexpansionism: If U.S. cuisine can encompass everything, there is nothing to protect, whether that’s biodiversity or cultural significance. It can grow into anything it has to be, even if that’s lab meat and Soylent.
On U.S. Cuisine
from Alicia Kennedy ✉️
Filed under:
Related Notes
- A bay is a noun only if water is dead. When bay is a noun, it is de...from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- Among our Potawatomi people, there are public names and true names....from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- Nobody is going to turn down getting their eyes scanned by a chrome...from Matt Levine
- The essence of the gift is that it creates a set of relationships. ...from Robin Wall Kimmerer
- I used to try and weed my lawn a whole hell of a lot and pull the w...from ferd.ca
- Cultural umami is the vague sense that yes, for some reason, it is....from nemesis.global
- Premium mediocre is the finest bottle of wine at Olive Garden. Prem...from Venkatesh Rao
- whenever folks talk about failed cultural change, I believe they’re...from Irrational Exuberance